Legal Protection of Banks as Creditors in Credit Agreements with Overlapping Land Guarantees

Authors

  • Tirsa Amadea Azarin Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Jamal Wiwoho Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Arief Suryono Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i3.128

Keywords:

Credit Agreement, Collateral, Overlapping

Abstract

A credit agreement is an agreement between the debtor and the creditor. The creditor has the right to seize the collateral if the debtor defaults or does not fulfill his obligation to repay the debt. If it is found that the condition of the collateral object is a plot of land with multiple or overlapping certificates, the creditor needs protection to overcome this. Likewise, the debtor is responsible for replacing the lost collateral object because the collateral object is a plot of land with multiple certificates. This research is prescriptive normative research, conducted with a statutory approach and tracing legal materials using literature studies or library research. The data used is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and non-legal materials. The results of this study found a solution that in Article 1131 of the Civil Code states that the credit agreement binds all of the debtor's assets. Thus, if the debtor defaults and the collateral object cannot be executed, the creditor can file a lawsuit for the replacement of the collateral object followed by a collateral seizure. The debtor is also responsible for replacing the collateral, to fulfill the creditor's rights.

References

Agussyah, M. Mas. (2024). Peran Notaris Dalam Penyusunan Akta Perjanjian Kredit Antara Bank Dan Nasabah (Studi Putusan Nomor 5/Pdt.G.S/2023/Pn Bdw). Notary Law Research, 6(1), 113-124.

Doly, Denico. (2011). Aspek Hukum Hak Tanggungan Dalam Pelaksanaan Roya. Negara Hukum, 2(1), 103-128.

Fatwa, Nur. (2017). Persaingan Perbankan Berdasarkan Jenis Bank Di Indonesia. Jurnal Nobel, 14 (4), H. 630-644.

Hulu, Klaudius Ilkam. (2021). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas Tanah Dalam Bukti Kepemilikan Hak. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1(1), 27-31.

Kaliey, Rivaldo Marcello, Karel Yossi Umboh, And Suriyono Soewikromo. (2023). Kedudukan Benda Tak Bergerak Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Lex Privatum 11, (1).

Muis, Irfan Ferdiansyah, Isis Ikhwansyah, And Tri Handayani. (2022). Kedudukan Kreditur Separatis Terkait Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Yang Masuk Dalam Boedel Pailit Debitur. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 3(2), 277–288.

Nurdianto, Fauzan Thariq. (2018). Pembayaran Ganti Rugi Oleh Debitur Kepada Kreditur Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Berdasarkan Pasal 1236 Kuh Perdata. Lex Et Societatis, 6(7), 58-65.

Nuryati, Nuryati, And Amethysa G. Gumilar. (2011). Analisis Perbandingan Bank Umum Konvensional Dan Bank Umum Syariah. Probank, 1(7).

Paparang, Fatma. (2014). Implementasi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Pemberian Kredit Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lppm Bidang Ekosusbudkum, 1(2), 56-70.

Putra, Rachmat Ade. (2023). Analisis Hukum Pendaftaran Jaminan Hipotek Terkait Objek Yang Sedang Dalam Sengketa Di Pengadilan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Samarinda Nomor: 1/G/2020/Ptun.Smd). Jurnal Law Of Deli Sumatera, 2 (2),.

Qatrunnada, Hanna Masawayh, Lailatul Choiriyah, And Nurul Fitriani. (2018). Gadai Dalam Perspektif Kuhperdata Dan Hukum Islam. Maliyah: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Islam 8(2), 175–97.

Rorong, Yolan Dorneka. (2018). Kajian Hukum Tentang Sita Jaminan Terhadap Barang Milik Tergugat Dengan Memperhatikan Sema No. 2 Tahun 1962 Tertanggal 25 April 1962. Lex Privatum, 6(1), 69-76.

Yahya, Harahap M. (2008), Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika.

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Amadea Azarin, T., Wiwoho, J., & Suryono, A. (2025). Legal Protection of Banks as Creditors in Credit Agreements with Overlapping Land Guarantees. Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL), 2(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i3.128