Analysis of the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement against Corruption Crimes

Authors

  • Salisah Salsabilla Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum (Alumni), Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v1i4.190

Keywords:

Corruption, Law Enforcement, Legal Framework, Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)

Abstract

Corruption remains one of the most persistent and damaging crimes affecting governance, economic development, and public trust in Indonesia. This study analyzes the effectiveness of law enforcement in combating corruption crimes, focusing on regulatory frameworks, institutional performance, and practical challenges in enforcement. Using a normative juridical method, the research examines Indonesian anti-corruption laws, key cases, and institutional roles, particularly those of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the police, and the judiciary. Findings indicate that while Indonesia has made significant legal and institutional progress, various challenges-including legal loopholes, political interference, and limited resources-continue to hinder optimal enforcement. The study also highlights fluctuations in Indonesia’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) over the past decade as a reflection of ongoing struggles. To enhance effectiveness, the study recommends strengthening legal provisions, boosting institutional capacities, and fostering a robust anti-corruption culture.

References

Indonesian Government. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Indonesian Government. (2001). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Kholisoh, N., & Ali, H. (2020). Shaping Radical Attitudes: Mass Media and Government Policies Analysis (Case Study in High School Students of West Jakarta). Talent Development & Excellence.

Indonesian Government. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.

Sulaeman, A. S., Waluyo, B., & Ali, H. (2019). Making dual procurement and supply chain operations: Cases in the indonesian higher education. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt Vol, 8(6), 595.

Widodo, D. S., Silitonga, P., & Ali, H. (2020). The Influence of Good Governance, Culture, and Performance in Increasing Public Satisfaction and Implication to Public Trust: Study in Indonesian Government. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(2).

Prayetno, S., & Ali, H. (2020). The influence of work motivation, entrepreneurship knowledge and advocate independence on advocate performance. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(3), 147-164.

Transparency International. (2015–2024). Corruption Perceptions Index Reports. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org

Butt, S. (2011). Anti-Corruption Reform in Indonesia: An Overview. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 47(3), 385–394.

McLeod, R. H. (2008). Inadequate Control of Corruption: The Role of Law Enforcement Institutions in Indonesia. Economic and Political Studies, 1(1), 25–45.

OECD. (2021). Anti-Corruption Reforms in Indonesia: Progress and Challenges. Paris: OECD Publishing.

BAstAri, A., & Ali, H. (2020). Service Performance Model Through Work Motivation: Analysis of Transformational Leadership, Managerial Coaching, and Organizational Commitments (At the Regional Development Bank of South Kalimantan). Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(12).

UNODC. (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). New York: United Nations.

KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi). (2023). Annual Report of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Jakarta: KPK.

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

Salsabilla, S. (2025). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement against Corruption Crimes. Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL), 1(4), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v1i4.190