Legal Analysis Of The Legal Status Of Authentic Deeds Forged By Notaries

Authors

  • Fadli Asri Putro Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Agus Riewanto Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Diana Lukitasari Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i4.196

Keywords:

Deed Forgery, Legal Certainty, Ownership Rights

Abstract

Thesis entitled Juridical Analysis of the Legal Status of Authentic Deed forged by Notary examines the case of forgery of power of sale deed by Notary Madiyana Herawati based on Semarang District Court Decision Number 773/Pid.B/2021/PN Smg. The background of the problem is the need for legal certainty for victims of forged authentic deeds that harm land ownership rights. The research aims to evaluate the state's guarantee of certificate property rights and the judge's consideration in the verdict. Using the normative juridical method by referring to Law No. 2 of 2014, UUPA, and the Civil Code, the research found that the fake deed is null and void because it does not fulfil the requirements of an agreement (Article 1320 of the Civil Code). However, the judge's decision has not provided an effective remedy for the victim, Suratinah, regarding the transferred land ownership rights. The research concludes that there is a need for a judge's decision instructing the cancellation of legally defective certificates through the BPN and the provision of restitution to ensure justice. These results contribute to the understanding of the legal status of forged deeds and provide practical input for notaries, judges and the BPN in preventing and dealing with the forgery of authentic deeds.

References

Abdulkadir Muhammad. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Bambang Sutiyoso. (2024). Implementasi Gugatan Legal Standing dan Class Action dalam Praktik Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol 26 (11)

Budiono Herlien. (2007). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang kenotariatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Cst Kansil, Christine, S.T Kansil, Engelien R, Palandeng & Godlieb N Mamahit. (2009). Kamus Istilah Hukum, Jakarta.

Febrian, R. C. (2022).Peran Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (Ppat) Dalam Penerapan Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan (Bphtb) Berkaitan Dengan Akta Jual Beli Tanah Di Kabupaten Batang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).

Hamzah Andi. (2001). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana dan Acara Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Hanitijo Soemitro Ronny. (1990). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetr. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Khaila Humaira R, M. Zaki RIzaldi, Asmak Ul Hosnah. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen, Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory. Universitas Pakuan Bogor. Vol 2(1)Purwaningsih, Endang. (2011). Penegakan Hukum jabatan Notaris dalam pembuatan perjanjian bedasarkan pancasila dalam rangka kepastian hukum. Jurnal Adil: Jurnal Hukum FH Yarsi Vol. No. 3

Suyadi Bill Graham Ambuliling. (2017). Pendaftaran Peralihan Hak Milik atas Tanah Melalui Jual Beli Berdasarkan PP No 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. Lex Privatum, 5(3)

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok Pokok Agraria (UUPA).

Yuliani, “Peran Mediasi BPN dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah,” Jurnal Legalitas Tanah, vol. 3, no. 2, 2022.

Published

2025-05-22

How to Cite

Putro, F. A., Riewanto, A., & Lukitasari, D. (2025). Legal Analysis Of The Legal Status Of Authentic Deeds Forged By Notaries. Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL), 2(4), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i4.196