Shooting of Indonesian Migrants by Malaysian Authorities in the Perspective of International Human Rights Law

Authors

  • Hanifah Qurrotu Aini Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Irwan Triadi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i4.231

Keywords:

Shooting, indonesian migrant workers, human rights, illegal migration

Abstract

The incident of the shooting of five Indonesian migrant workers (PMI) by the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (APMM) in the waters of Tanjung Rhu, Selangor, on January 24, 2025, which resulted in two deaths and three injuries, highlights violations of human rights (HAM) and international legal norms.This research examines the actions of the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (APMM) that allegedly used excessive force and committed extrajudicial killings, violating Article 3 of the UDHR, Article 6 of the ICCPR, and Article 104 of Law No. 39/1999.The driving factors of illegal migration, such as the lack of job opportunities in Indonesia and the allure of high wages in Malaysia, are exacerbated by labor trafficking syndicates.The Indonesian government has sent diplomatic notes and provided legal assistance, but the weakness of bilateral agreements poses a challenge.This normative legal research recommends a systematic approach to law enforcement, eradication of labor trafficking, and protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers (PMI) to prevent the recurrence of tragedy.

References

BBC. (2025). Lima WNI ditembak aparat Malaysia di perairan Selangor, pemerintah Indonesia diminta bersikap tegas – “Hampir terjadi tiap tahun dan tidak pernah tuntas.” BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cp3wxzx9qyro

Fajriadi, A. I. (2025). Upaya Pemerintah Indonesia Mengungkap Fakta Penembakan Lima WNI di Malaysia. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/politik/upaya-pemerintah-indonesia-mengungkap-fakta-penembakan-lima-wni-di-malaysia-1199962

Fikri, S. (2022). Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia Bagi Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Luar Negeri. MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v8i2.255

Grehenson, G. (2025). Tindakan Aparat Malaysia Tembak Migran Indonesia Dinilai Melanggar HAM. UGM. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/tindakan-aparat-malaysia-tembak-migran-indonesia-dinilai-melanggar-ham

Ikhsanudin, A. (2025). KBRI Ungkap Kronologi Rinci WNI Tewas Ditembak Aparat Malaysia di Laut. Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7758104/kbri-ungkap-kronologi-rinci-wni-tewas-ditembak-aparat-malaysia-di-laut

Munir, A. S., Eka Saputri, B., & Azaria Rachma, S. (2022). Extrajudicial Killing: Pelanggaran Hak atas Hidup dan Kaitannya dengan Asas Praduga Tak Bersalah. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i12.345

Nation, U. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Nation, U. (1984). Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Indonesian.

Nation, U. (1991). Manual on The Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions.

Nation, U. (2021). Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (pp. 1–15).

Pratiwi, M. R., & Yusriana, A. (2018). REFLEKSI CITRA INDONESIA SEBAGAI DAMPAK POLITIK MIGRASI TKI KE MALAYSIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi Makna. https://doi.org/10.30659/jikm.6.1.46-59

Sukamto, I. (2025). Kasus Penembakan Pekerja Migran Indonesia di Malaysia, Yusril: Hormati Langkah Hukum Otoritas Malaysia. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/hukum/kasus-penembakan-pekerja-migran-indonesia-di-malaysia-yusril-hormati-langkah-hukum-otoritas-malaysia-1212921

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. (1999).

Yanuar H. (2025). Aparat Malaysia Tembak Pekerja Migran, Pemerhati HAM Desak Pemerintah Bersikap. Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/5908859/aparat-malaysia-tembak-pekerja-migran-pemerhati-ham-desak-pemerintah-bersikap

Published

2025-06-19

How to Cite

Aini, H. Q., & Triadi, I. (2025). Shooting of Indonesian Migrants by Malaysian Authorities in the Perspective of International Human Rights Law. Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL), 2(4), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i4.231