The Impact of Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXII/2024 on the Retirement Age Limit for Notaries from the Perspective of Justice and Legal Certainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v3i1.269Keywords:
Constitutional Court, Notary, Justice, Legal CertaintyAbstract
Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXII/2024 introduces significant changes to the regulation of the retirement age for notaries in Indonesia. Previously, the Notary Position Law strictly limited the retirement age to 65 years, or up to 67 years with an extension. However, through this decision, the Court allows notaries to remain in office beyond the age of 67, provided they meet physical and mental health requirements as well as demonstrate professional integrity. This study employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive approach, using both doctrinal analysis and primary and secondary data sources. The findings reveal that the decision has amended the retirement age limit for notaries from 67 to 70 years. Furthermore, it provides an opportunity for notaries to serve beyond that age as long as they meet the health criteria. From a justice perspective, this is seen as a protection of constitutional rights; however, it still requires clear and objective parameters to avoid inequality. While the extension acknowledges the competence of senior notaries, it may hinder generational renewal and create legal uncertainty without proper oversight. Therefore, the role of professional organizations and the government is essential to ensure fair and professional implementation.
References
Agatha Olivia Victoria. (2025). Kemenkum kaji putusan MK soal perpanjangan usia pensiun notaris - ANTARA News Gorontalo.
Asyatama, F. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Setelah Berakhir Masa Jabatannya Terhadap Kesalahan Ketik Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cilacap Nomor 114/PDT.P/ 2018/PN.CLP). Indonesian Notary, 3(10), 247.
Bachrudin. (2015). Jabatan Notaris Di Indonesia Dalam Jerat Liberalisasi. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2(2), 185–186.
Budiono, H. (2013). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gusriana, A. M. (2011). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Gugatan Pihak Ketiga Setelah Berakhir Masa Jabatannya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Ikhtisar Putusan Perkara Nomor?: 84/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Konstitusionalitas Perpanjangan Umur Pensiun Notaris.
Ketut Tjukup, I., & et.al. (2016). Akta Notaris (Akta Otentik) Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Perdata. Acta Comitas, Vol. 1(2), 182.
Kie, T. T. (2000). Studi Kenotariatan dan Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris. PT. Icthiar baru Van Hoeven.
Konstitusi, M. (2025). No Title. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=22034
Munawaroh, N. (2024). Apa Itu Open Legal Policy? In Www.Hukumonline.Com. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/apa-itu-open-legal-policy-lt5460bcac21ce7/
Nurwaningsih, W. (2019). Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Pensiunan Notaris Atas Akta Yang Pernah Dibuat. Universitas Jember.
Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021. (n.d.). Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tata Beracara Dalam Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang.
Pertiwi, S. M. (2014). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Otentik Yang Berakibat Batal Demi Hukum Pada Saat Berakhir Masa Jabatannya. Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor?: 84/PUU-XXII/2024. (n.d.).
Putusan Mahkamah Kontitusi Nomor?:84/PUU-XII/2024. (n.d.).
Ricco Survival Yubaidi. (2025). Putusan MK Tentang Batas Usia Jabatan Notaris: Kepastian Hukum yang Masih Menggantung? https://literasihukum.com/putusan-mk-tentang-batas-usia-jabatan-notaris-kepastian-hukum-yang-masih-menggantung/#google_vignette
Sambari, R. (2025). Profesor Suparji Ahmad_ Batas Usia Pensiun Notaris Bentuk Ketidakadilan.
Saputro, A. D. (2010). Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu, Sekarang, dan di Masa Datang. PT. Gramedia Pustaka.
Sjaifurrachman. (2010). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta,. Mandar Maju.
Sukma, G. G. M. (2020). Open Legal Policy Peraturan Perundang-undangan Bidang Politik Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi terhadap Putusan MK Bidang Politik Tahun 2015-2017). Lex Renaissance, 1(5), 6.
Wibowo, M. (2019). Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi konsep dan kajian dalam pembatasan kebebasan pembentuk undang-undang. Rajawali Pers.
Zaman, I. F. (2023). https://pinterhukum.or.id/mahkamah-konstitusi-negative-legislator-menujupositive-legislator/.https://pinterhukum.or.id/mahkamah-konstitusi-negative-legislator-menujupositive-legislator/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meidya Utama Prayoga, Agus Riewanto, Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at SIJAL.
