Prevention, Law Enforcement, and Protection Strategies in the Digital Economy Ecosystem: An Integrated Legal Governance Framework for Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v4i2.429Keywords:
cybercrime, digital economy, law enforcement, victim protection, cybersecurity governanceAbstract
Indonesia’s digital economy expands financial inclusion, market access, and transactional efficiency, but also increases exposure to fraud, phishing, identity theft, data breaches, ransomware, and payment abuse. This study examines the adequacy of Indonesia’s legal and institutional arrangements for preventing, investigating, and remedying economic cybercrime and formulates an integrated governance model. Using normative legal research, the study applies statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches to legislation, regulatory instruments, institutional materials, and recent scholarship. The analysis finds that Indonesia possesses substantial criminal, data-protection, electronic-system, financial-sector, and consumer-protection rules, yet their operation remains fragmented across institutions and stages of response. Prevention still relies excessively on user awareness; enforcement is constrained by volatile evidence, uneven capacity, delayed asset freezing, and cross-border barriers; and remedies do not consistently restore victims’ finances, identities, or procedural position. The study proposes an Integrated Digital Economic Security Governance framework comprising a shared risk taxonomy, prevention by design, differentiated platform duties, coordinated evidence preservation and enforcement, victim-centred remedies, accountable international cooperation, and continuous evaluation. Its novelty lies in allocating responsibility according to institutional capacity, knowledge, and control while linking cybersecurity, law enforcement, corporate accountability, and victim recovery within one rights-based and risk-responsive legal architecture.
References
Bank Indonesia. (2023). Indonesia payment systems blueprint and payment-system policy materials. https://www.bi.go.id
Casino, F., Pina, C., López-Aguilar, P., Batista, E., Solanas, A., & Patsakis, C. (2022). SoK:
Cross-border criminal investigations and digital evidence. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1), tyac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac014
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2023). ENISA threat landscape 2023. Publications Office of the European Union.
Financial Services Authority. (2023). Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 22 of 2023 concerning consumer and public protection in the financial services sector.
Financial Services Authority. (2024a). Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 3 of 2024 concerning the implementation of financial sector technology innovation.
Financial Services Authority. (2024b). Cybersecurity guidelines for financial sector technology innovation providers. https://ojk.go.id
Financial Services Authority. (2025). Cybersecurity guideline for digital financial asset trading operators. https://ojk.go.id
Financial Services Authority. (2026). Governance and risk management for financial sector technology innovation and digital financial assets. https://ojk.go.id
Giova, C. (2023). Electronic evidence management under the Budapest Convention: Principles and contemporary challenges. International Information Security Research Journal, 7(2), 41–58.
Indonesia. (2008). Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning electronic information and transactions.https://review.e-
Indonesia. (2019). Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the operation of
electronic systems and transactions.
Indonesia. (2022). Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning personal data protection.
Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
Indonesia. (2024). Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning electronic information and transactions.
Internet & Jurisdiction Policy Network. (2021). Toolkit: Cross-border access to electronic evidence. https://www.internetjurisdiction.net
INTERPOL. (2024). Global financial fraud assessment. INTERPOL.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). OECD policy framework on digital security. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Consumer vulnerability in the digital age. OECD Publishing.
Rosyidah, A. A. (2024). Cybercrime against women’s personal data in financial technology services. Jurnal Kajian Media dan Informasi, 13(2), 137–158.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). Practical guide for requesting electronic evidence across borders. United Nations.
World Bank. (2022). Digital financial services and consumer risks: Supervisory approaches for emerging markets. World Bank.
World Economic Forum. (2024). Global cybersecurity outlook 2024. World Economic Forum.
Zhang, H. (2024). The research on an electronic evidence forensic system for cross-border cybercrime. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 28(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231187059
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riyanto, Joko Sriwidodo, Lusia Sulastri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright :
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
- The author acknowledges that the Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at SIJAL.






















