Anatomical Structure of Duck Feet and Running Exercise Intensity on the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Runners in Indonesia: Literature Review

Salsabila Dwi Fitri; Yorasaki Ananta

Authors

Salsabila Dwi Fitri Universitas Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
Yorasaki Ananta Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Duck Feet, Musculoskeletal Injury, Running Intensity, Biomechanics, Indonesian Runners

Abstract

The anatomical structure of the foot plays an important role in biomechanical efficiency when running. One of the anatomical variations that is often found is the duck feet condition, which is a position of the feet that points outward when walking or running. This study aims to examine the effect of duck feet and the intensity of running training on the risk of musculoskeletal injuries in runners, especially in Indonesia. The method used is a literature review of various relevant national and international journals in the last 5 years. The results of the study indicate that duck feet posture can cause biomechanical imbalances that increase pressure on the knee, ankle, and lower back joints, and contribute to the risk of recurrent injury. Meanwhile, excessive training intensity without proper control also exacerbates the risk of injury. A better understanding of the foot structure and training intensity settings is needed from coaches, physiotherapists, and runners to prevent long-term musculoskeletal injuries.

References

Almeida, S. M., & James, S. L. (2020). Biomechanical factors and their relationship with running-related injuries: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 19(4), 567–573.

Benca, E., Hladik, M., & Svoboda, Z. (2017). Foot posture and its relationship to lower limb injury in runners. Gait & Posture, 55, 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.004

Esculier, J.-F., Silvini, T., & Roy, J.-S. (2022). Running biomechanics and injury risk: A narrative review. Sports Medicine, 52(3), 423–437.

Ferber, R., Noehren, B., Hamill, J., & Davis, I. S. (2010). Competitive female runners with a history of iliotibial band syndrome demonstrate atypical hip and knee kinematics. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 40(2), 52–58.

Hreljac, A. (2004). Impact and overuse injuries in runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 36(5), 845–849. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000126803.66636.DD

Johnson, C. D., & Vincent, H. K. (2015). Biomechanics and injury prevention in runners. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 26(1), 1–17.

Kulmala, J. P., Avela, J., Pasanen, K., & Parkkari, J. (2018). Forefoot strikers exhibit lower running-induced knee loading than rearfoot strikers. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 50(6), 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001556

Lopes, A. D., Hespanhol, L. C., Yeung, S. S., & Costa, L. O. (2012). What are the main running-related musculoskeletal injuries? A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 42(10), 891–905.

Napier, C., & Willy, R. W. (2018). Logical fallacies in the running injury literature: Have we been duped? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(13), 826–827. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098234

Sinclair, J. (2014). Effects of barefoot and barefoot inspired footwear on knee and ankle loading during running. Clinical Biomechanics, 29(4), 395–399.

Willy, R. W., & Davis, I. S. (2011). The effect of a hip-strengthening program on mechanics during running and during a single-leg squat. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 41(9), 625–632.

Prayetno, S., & Ali, H. (2020). Entrepreneurial supply chain management competence: Predictors of work motivation advocate. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 444-454.