Comparison of Justice Collaborator Law in Indonesia and Thailand: Regulation and Case Handling

Authors

  • Luqmanul Hakim Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia
  • Lina Sinaulan Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia
  • Joko Sriwidodo Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v3i2.325

Keywords:

Justice Collaborator, Comparison, Indonesia, Thailand

Abstract

Justice collaborator is actually held to provide appreciation to perpetrators who cooperate in uncovering a crime in the form of reduced sentences or legal protection, so that the disclosure of a crime committed by law enforcement officers can be resolved more quickly.

optimal, but in some countries there are states that regulate this Justice collaborator is specifically regulated in legislation specifically made regarding Justice collaborator, there are also those that regulate it generally in witness protection laws, such as those regulated in The Witness Protection Act BE 2546 of 2003, which is known in the regulation, the regulation regarding Justice collaborator is not regulated and mentioned specifically, however protection for parties who cooperate with law enforcement can receive special treatment ranging from physical protection, to reduced sentences if involved in a criminal act. This seems similar to the Justice Collaborator regulation regulated in Indonesia through Law Number 31 of 2014 and Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2011. However, there are actually many differences both in terms of legal regulations and the practice of Justice Collaborators between Indonesia and Thailand, and will be further discussed in this study. This study uses a normative juridical research method, with secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that there are differences in the existence of the term justice collaborator in regulations in Indonesia and Thailand, however, conceptually, both Indonesia and Thailand have the same concept and type of regulation and appreciation for justice collaborators. The differences in methods and implementation for perpetrators who cooperate or justice collaborators between Indonesia and Thailand are in the form of protection, institutions authorized to provide determinations, international cooperation, and the concept of submission by perpetrators who wish to request cooperation with law enforcement. 

References

Hatta, M., et al. (2020). Reverse proof system for corruption crimes in Indonesia. Sefa Media Perkasa.

Iskandar, O. (2022). Legal protection in the justice collaborator system. Deppublisher.

Robert, K., & Irawan, A. (2018). Witness protection law. Thafa Media.

Semendawai, A. H. (2013). The existence of justice collaborators in corruption cases. Witness and Victim Protection Agency of the Republic of Indonesia.

Task Force for the Eradication of Legal Mafia. (2011). Protection for perpetrators collaborating (justice collaborators): Proposal for revision of the law on witness and victim protection.

Waluyo, B. (2012). Victimology of witness and victim protection. Sinar Grafika.

Wysong, W. (2020). A guide to anti-corruption legislation in Asia-Pacific (6th ed.). Clifford Chance.

Dairerkngam, A. (2015). Financial investigation and measures for confiscation and asset recovery in Thailand. UNAFEI Journal, Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission, Thailand.

Government of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 31 of 2014 on witness and victim protection.

Government of Indonesia. (2025). Government Regulation No. 24 of 2025 on special handling and awarding of witnesses and perpetrators.

Iskandar, O. (2022). Legal protection in the justice collaborator system. Deppublisher.

Juniarto, D., et al. (2016). Protection of witnesses and victims. National Commission on Violence Against Women.

Semendawai, A. H. (2013). The existence of justice collaborators in corruption cases. Witness and Victim Protection Agency of the Republic of Indonesia.

Semendawai, A. H. (2017). Portrait of witness and victim protection. Witness and Victim Protection Agency of the Republic of Indonesia.

Tofik, Y. C. (2022). KPK and the authority to determine justice collaborator status. Sangir Multi Usaha.

Waluyo, B. (2012). Victimology of witness and victim protection. Sinar Grafika.

Wijaya, F. (2012). Whistleblower and justice collaborator in legal perspective. Penaku.

Wysong, W. (2020). A guide to anti-corruption legislation in Asia-Pacific (6th ed.). Clifford Chance.

Yahman. (2019). The role of justice collaborators in the national legal system. Jakad Media Publishing.

United Nations. (2003). United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC).

United Nations. (2004). United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).

Published

2025-10-22

How to Cite

Luqmanul Hakim, Lina Sinaulan, & Joko Sriwidodo. (2025). Comparison of Justice Collaborator Law in Indonesia and Thailand: Regulation and Case Handling. Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL), 3(2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v3i2.325