Employee Performance from perspective Workload and Work Environmental

Authors

  • Yudi Rachmat Kurniawan Economic and Business Faculty, Winaya Mukti University, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijdb.v2i3.134

Keywords:

Workload, Work Environment, Employee Performance

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze: (1) Workload (2) Work Environment; (3) Employee performance; and (4) The Influence of Workload and Work Environment on Employee Performance at XYZ Company in Bandung City, both simultaneously and partially. The research method used in this study is descriptive survey and explanatory survey, the unit of analysis in this study is employees at XYZ Company in Bandung City with a sample of 30 people. The type of investigation is causality, and the time horizon in this study is cross-sectional. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that the Workload experienced by Employees at XYZ Company in Bandung City is good, the Work Environment at XYZ Company in Bandung City can generally be said to be good, Employee Performance at XYZ Company in Bandung City is currently considered good. Workload and Work Environment affect Employee Performance at XYZ Company in Bandung City simultaneously and partially. However, partially Workload predominantly affects Employee Performance rather than Work Environment. Because Workload more dominantly affects Performance, it becomes the first priority in improving Performance. Therefore, employees at XYZ Company in Bandung are advised to improve their working conditions and atmosphere, so that they are able to work more professionally.

References

Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2008, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

Alex S Nitisemito, 2000. Manajemen personalia:Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Ed 3, Ghalia Indonesia.Jakarta.

Bambang Kussriyanto.,1991. Meningkatkan produktifitas karyawan.Pustaka Binaman Pressindo,Jakarta.

Bambang Wahyudi, 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jakarta : Erlangga.

Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi,2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Grasindo. Jakarta.

Irwandy, 2007. Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Beban Kerja Perawat di Unit Rawat Inap RSJ Dadi Makassar Tahun 2005. Magister Administrasi Rumah Sakit. Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat. Universitas Hasanuddin

Komaruddin, 1994. Pengantar Manajemen Perusahaan. Gramedia. Jakarta.

Kuswandi, 2004. Cara mengukur kepuasaan kerja. Elex Media Komputindo.Jakarta

Manuaba. A 2000, Ergonomi, Kesehatanan Keselamatan Kerja.”Eds.Proceeing Seminar Nasional Ergonomi PT. Guna Widya, Surabaya

Munandar, AS. 2001. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Universitas Indonesia Press.Jakarta.

Munandar, A.S, “Stress dan Keselamatan Kerja “Psikologi industri dan organisasi. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. 2001

Moeheriono,2009. Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia

Sarwoto, 2001. Dasar-Dasar Organisasi dan Manajemen, cetakan kedelapan, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Sedarmayanti, 2001. Sumber Daya Manusia dan produktifitas Kerja. Mandar Maju.Bandung.

Sedarmayanti, 2004. Good Goverment (Pemerintahan yang baik), Bandung.CV.Mandar Maju.

Siagian, Sondang, P. 2008. Teori Motivasi dan Aplikasinya. Rineka Cipta.

Sofyandi herman, dan garniwa iwa.2007, Perilaku Organisasional.Graha Ilmu,Yogyakarta

Susilo Maryoto, 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE-UGM.Yogyakarta.

Undang-Undang No. 44 tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit, Biro Hukum Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.

Veithzal Rivai, 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Published

2025-02-18

How to Cite

Rachmat Kurniawan, Y. (2025). Employee Performance from perspective Workload and Work Environmental. Siber International Journal of Digital Business (SIJDB), 2(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijdb.v2i3.134