Assessment of Digital Battery Management and Maintenance Protocols for Maximizing 220Ah Tubular Battery Lifespan

Authors

  • Obiora Jeremiah Obiafudo Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Godspower Onyekachukwu Ekwueme Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Ugochukwu Richards Orji Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
  • Chibuzo Benjamin Nwanonobi Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijdb.v3i1.282

Keywords:

Digital battery management, Tubular lead-acid batteries, Maintenance protocols, Lifespan optimization, Energy storage systems

Abstract

Reliable energy storage is critical for sustainable power systems, particularly in academic environments where interruptions can disrupt teaching and research. Tubular lead-acid batteries, widely adopted for their affordability and robustness, often face reduced lifespan due to inadequate maintenance and poor monitoring practices. With the advent of digital technologies, battery management can now integrate real-time monitoring, predictive diagnostics, and automated alerts to improve efficiency and reliability. A three-phase framework—data collection and modeling, performance evaluation, and economic benchmarking—ensured coherence and reproducibility. Monocrystalline PV modules (220–330W, 18–20% efficiency) were mounted at a 7° tilt for optimal irradiance in Southern Nigeria, supported by passive cooling. A 60A MPPT charge controller and a 1kW pure sine wave inverter were modeled with high efficiency and protective features. Battery protocols were developed for both tubular lead-acid and LiFePO? types, balancing monitoring, maintenance, and cost quantification to maximize reliability, performance, and lifespan in academic settings. The results show clear differences between tubular lead-acid and LiFePO? batteries in maintenance, cost, and performance. Tubular systems demand weekly checks, monthly charging, and quarterly testing, totaling about 156 labor hours per year, compared to just 24 hours per year for LiFePO? with automated BMS monitoring. Results further indicate that incorporating digital monitoring reduces downtime, enhances predictive maintenance, and extends battery life. The study demonstrates that digital integration provides a cost-effective and sustainable framework for academic institutions, particularly in resource-constrained contexts.

References

Adetona, Z. A., Ogunyemi, J., & Bitrus, I. (2020). Maintenance management regime for off-grid solar PV renewable energy system in Nigeria. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 5(11), 1376-1382.

Enache, B. A., Seritan, G. C., Grigorescu, S. D., Cepisca, C., Adochiei, F. C., Argatu, V. V., & Voicila, T. I. (2020, October). A battery screening system for second life LiFePO? batteries. In 2020 International Conference and Exposition on Electrical And Power Engineering (EPE) (pp. 298-301). IEEE.

Gabbar, H. A., Othman, A. M., & Abdussami, M. R. (2021). Review of battery management systems (BMS) development and industrial standards. Technologies, 9(2), 28.

Graham, J. D., Rupp, J. A., & Brungard, E. (2021). Lithium in the green energy transition: The quest for both sustainability and security. Sustainability, 13(20), 11274.

Haldar, S., Gol, S., Mondal, A., & Banerjee, R. (2024). IoT-enabled advanced monitoring system for tubular batteries: Enhancing efficiency and reliability. E-Prime-Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 9, 100709.

Jan, K. U., Dubois, A. M., Diallo, D., Uddin, W., Nasir, M., & Khan, I. (2020, September). Reuse Legacy to Repower the Microgrids–An Affordable Solution for Test and Restoration of Repurposed Lead Acid Batteries. In 2020 2nd International Conference on Smart Power & Internet Energy Systems (SPIES) (pp. 463-468). IEEE.

Krishna, G., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Akram, S. V., Priyadarshi, N., & Twala, B. (2022). Digital technology implementation in battery-management systems for sustainable energy storage: review, challenges, and recommendations. Electronics, 11(17), 2695.

Madani, S.S., Shabeer, Y., Fowler, M., Panchal, S., Chaoui, H., Mekhilef, S., Dou, S.X. and See, K., 2025. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin Technologies for Intelligent Lithium-Ion Battery Management Systems: A Comprehensive Review of State Estimation, Lifecycle Optimization, and Cloud-Edge Integration. Batteries, 11(8), p.298.

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2025). Battery lifespan. U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved 06/09/25 from https://www.nrel.gov/transportation/battery-lifespan

Park, S., Ahn, J., Kang, T., Park, S., Kim, Y., Cho, I., & Kim, J. (2020). Review of state-of-the-art battery state estimation technologies for battery management systems of stationary energy storage systems. Journal of Power Electronics, 20(6), 1526-1540.

Rostami, H., Valio, J., Tynjälä, P., Lassi, U., & Suominen, P. (2024). Life cycle of LiFePO4 batteries: production, recycling, and market trends. ChemPhysChem, 25(24), e202400459.

Senol, M., Bayram, I. S., Naderi, Y., & Galloway, S. (2023). Electric vehicles under low temperatures: A review on battery performance, charging needs, and power grid impacts. Ieee Access, 11, 39879-39912.

Wang, J., Wang, Z., Ni, J., & Li, L. (2022). Electrospun materials for batteries moving beyond lithium-ion technologies. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 5(2), 211-241.

Yudhistira, R., Khatiwada, D., & Sanchez, F. (2022). A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 131999.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

Obiafudo, O. J., Ekwueme, G. O., Orji, U. R., & Nwanonobi, C. B. (2025). Assessment of Digital Battery Management and Maintenance Protocols for Maximizing 220Ah Tubular Battery Lifespan. Siber International Journal of Digital Business (SIJDB), 3(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijdb.v3i1.282

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): (SIJDB) Siber International Journal of Digital Business (July - September 2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Obiora Jeremiah Obiafudo, Godspower Onyekachukwu Ekwueme, Ugochukwu Richards Orji, Chibuzo Benjamin Nwanonobi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:

  1. Copyright in each article belongs to the author.
  2. The author acknowledges that the Siber International Journal of Digital Business (SIJDB) has the right to be the first to publish under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International CC BY 4.0).
  3. Authors can submit articles separately, arrange the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal to other versions (for example, sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time at Siber International Journal of Digital Business (SIJDB).