Optimization of Cluster House Construction Using Critical Path Method (CPM) and Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Program at PT.XYZ

Authors

  • Tubagus Hedi Saepudin Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya university, Indonesia
  • Andi Turseno Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya university, Indonesia
  • Andreas Tri Panudju Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya university, Indonesia
  • Reni Masrida Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya university, Indonesia
  • Riyan Ramadhan Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya university, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sijet.v1i1.67

Keywords:

Project Management CPM-PERT Method, Interview

Abstract

PT.XYZ So research was carried out so that we could find the critical path for a house construction project using the CPM method, the duration of the critical path for building a house, and how much budget was spent on building a house using the CPM method. CPM is a project management concept which is interpreted in a network image that marks project activities from start to finish with the aim of determining the critical path and PERT is a network model that is able to determine the completion time of activities. The aim is to assess and review development projects and requires three calculations. optimistic, pessimistic and realistic. The results of this research show that house construction project work using the CPM method has a work duration of 182 days, a decrease of 118 days from the actual duration and the costs incurred in this work are IDR 1,956,043,000. can reduce the budget by IDR 771,914,000/35% of the actual budget. The house construction project produces a Te value of 182.48 and a standard deviation value of 8.09 and has a probability of 53.59% if the project is completed within 182 days. However, if you use the assumption that the project can be completed within 190 days, the probability is 83.89%.

References

Abdurrasyid, A., Luqman, L., Haris, A., & Indrianto, I. (2019). Implementation of PERT and CPM Methods in Shipbuilding Project Management Information System. Khazanah Informatika: Journal of Computer and Information Science, 5(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.23917/khif.v5i1.7066

Assabil, I. R., Hanifi, R., Suhendra, B., Sarjana, M., Mesin, T., Singaperbangsa, U., Assabil, I. R., Hanifi, R., & Suhendra, B. (2023). Damage Analysis on Conveyor Belt Using Fishbone Diagram Method (Case Study: PT Berkah Beton Sadaya Tbk). 3, 8306-8313.

Febriana, W., & Aziz, A. (2021). Analysis of Project Scheduling with PERT Method Using Microsoft Project 2016. Surya Beton Journal, 5(1), 37-45. http://jurnal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/suryabeton

Firdaus, A., Humaira, H. W., & Firdaus, A. (2019). The Effect of Brainstorming Method on. IX(1), 142-153.

Ikhram, F. (2018). Development of Change Management in an Effort to Improve the Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning. Scientific Journal of Master of Administrative Sciences (JIMIA), XII(1), 77-93.

Leksono, B., Nugroho, D., & Yanti, E. I. (2020). Optimisation of Time Implementation of Construction of Student Practice Room of SMK Negeri 1 Duduksampeyan with PERT Method. Journal of Scientific and Applied Engineering, Vol 9(2), 49-61.

Putra, J. G., & Sekarsari, J. (2020). Analysis of Multi-storey Building Project Scheduling with Pert and M-Pert Methods Using Monte Carlo Simulation. JMTS: Journal of Civil Engineering Partners, 3(3), 533. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v3i3.8395

Regatama, G. et al. (2019). Network Planning Analysis of SPB TITAN 70 Ship Repairs with Critical Path Method. Journal of Shipbuilding Engineering, 5(2), 421-430.

Sumasto, F., Satria, P., & Rusmiati, E. (2022). Implementation of DMAIC Approach for Quality Improvement in Railway Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering INTECH Universitas Serang Raya, 8(2), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.30656/intech.v8i2.4734

Downloads

Published

2023-07-15

How to Cite

Hedi Saepudin, T., Turseno, A., Tri Panudju, A., Masrida, R., & Ramadhan, R. (2023). Optimization of Cluster House Construction Using Critical Path Method (CPM) and Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) Program at PT.XYZ. Siber International Journal of Education Technology (SIJET), 1(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijet.v1i1.67