Implementation of Innovative Learning Models to Increase Interest in Learning Sports Among Teenagers
Keywords:
Innovative learning models, Sports education, Teenagers, Learning interest, Game-based learning, Collaborative learning, Blended learningAbstract
This study aims to examine the implementation of innovative learning models to increase teenagers’ interest in learning sports. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected through online questionnaires from 120 secondary school students. The results indicate that innovative learning models such as game-based learning, collaborative learning, and blended learning significantly enhance students’ enthusiasm, active participation, and motivation in sports education. Statistical analysis shows a positive and significant effect of these models on students’ learning interest, with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.48. Students reported that interactive and engaging methods make sports lessons more enjoyable and easier to understand. However, challenges such as limited facilities, time constraints, and technological access were noted as obstacles to optimal implementation. This study highlights the importance of adopting diverse and student-centered learning strategies in physical education to foster not only physical fitness but also social skills and self-confidence among teenagers. It is recommended that schools and educators support the continuous development and application of innovative learning approaches to improve educational outcomes in sports.
References
Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Ridwan, M., Mulyani, S. R., & Ali, H. (2020). Perceived Organizational Support in Efforts to Improve Organizational Commitments and Its Impact on Employee Performance (Study at SPMI Private University in West Sumatra). Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1).
Desfiandi, A., Yusendra, M. A. E., Paramitasari, N., & Ali, H. (2019). Supply chain strategy development for business and technological institution in developing start-up based on creative economy. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag, 8(6), 646-654.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26-35.
Setyadi, A., Ali, H., & Imaroh, T. S. (2017). Building brand image: Analysis of service quality and customer satisfaction. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(8), 770-777.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
Ali, H., Sastrodiharjo, I., & Saputra, F. (2022). Measurement of Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Workload, Work Culture and Motivation (Literature Review Study). Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 1(1), 83-93.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Sutiksno, S. D. U., Rufaidah, P., Ali, H., & Souisa, W. (2017). A Literature Review of Strategic Marketing and The Resource Based View of The Firm. Int. J. Econ. Res, 14(8), 59-73.
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.
Chen, W., & Light, R. (2021). Applying student-centered learning in physical education: A pedagogical model of teaching games for understanding. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 21(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.01006
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dyson, B. (2001). Cooperative learning in an elementary physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20(4), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.20.4.264
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2014). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
Méndez-Giménez, A., Fernández-Río, J., & Cecchini, J. A. (2015). Motivation and teaching styles in physical education: An integrated approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.010
Mitra, S., & Dangwal, R. (2010). Limits to self-organising systems of learning—the Kalikuppam experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 672–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01077.x
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
Ward, P., & Lee, M. A. (2005). Peer-assisted learning in physical education: A review of theory and research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(3), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.24.3.205
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Roma Wibero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
